I’m going to break it down in bits, ucalcal, because I don’t think we disagree, and I want to give you a better picture of what I believe, and a response rather than a rant. Your quotes are italicized.
Wow…once again I see that those that preach something have a hard time dealing with others asking why they are not consistent with their argument.
Where was I inconsistent? Because if I was, I’d like to see it. I hate waffling, and I do it often enough to despair of ever being free.
While I don’t feel I am talking out of my a@@ as you mentioned, I do wonder why you feel that the powerful nurses union could not have a say in this issue.
Well, I didn’t say they couldn’t have a say. I said that they weren’t in control of the paramedic companies. It seems that you think that if the nurses union simply pushed hard enough, they could get whatever they wanted from…whomever. Maybe so, but expecting a union that serves a certain group of people–people who pay dues and so have a vested interest in said union’s activities–to advocate for everyone is irrational.
I’m not going to say, in this post, whether or not I think they should…oh wait, yes I am. Okay, I do think that the nurses union should advocate for better ratios, not merely for themselves, but for everyone. But I know we don’t live in a world that rewards us for what we should do, and I know I can’t demand that a union of which I am not a part spend their resources trying to get a better deal for members of other unions & professions.
If you are going to make a public argument that ratio’s in healthcare a crucial to good care then you must take the logical path that there should be ratios for every part of the “healthcare” team. I am not against ratios, the problem I have is with one group trying to say they are the patients advocates but stop advocating for patients once it falls out of the scope of work that their union represents.
That’s fair. I don’t have a problem with this at all–in fact, I agree. If the nurses union is truly interested in the patient first, themselves second, they should continue that advocacy across healthcare as a whole. I’m assuming that the union, since they claim to advocate for the patients, feel that it is not the best use of their resources to push for ratios in other areas. Maybe they think that if paramedic ratios are a problem, paramedics should do something about it. I don’t know.
If you want a ratio to ensure higher pay and job security (just like the correctional peace officers received in California by backing 3 Strikes and ensuring that there would be inmates for 20 years to life [isn’t it funny that 20 years is the magic number for retirement…if their crimes are so bad why not 30 years to life or just life] then just come out and say that. I am not against that…but don’t run around California and say we are for patients when that had very little to actually do with the reasons you wanted a RN ratio. Hey by the way what about LVNs? What about CNAs? Maybe if they were apart of your union, you would have gotten them a ratio to.
Yeah, the whole 20 year thing. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that it’s a nice, round number. Sounds better than 10, not as difficult to multiply as 30. Heck, I don’t know. Everything I know about the law I learned from Law & Order…so, not much. If anything. Regarding the LVNs and CNAs, well, they aren’t a part of the union. That’s what I’m saying, and that’s the issue I had with your comment to begin with. Not that ratios are good, or bad, or anything at all. Just that other parts of the “healthcare team” better step up if they don’t want things to go to hell in a handbasket (obligitory cliche? check.) right fast and in a hurry (thanks for the farmer talk, grandpa). Because you can’t expect the nurses union to go, “Whoa, we better back down. We’ve got ourselves a pretty nice deal, here, but whoops! Where’d everybody else go?” You would (and are). I see it, too. But unions are rather like weeds–out of control in no time. The only checks are the nurses themselves, and the competing interests…which, at the moment, are doing precisely squat.
The other problem I have with the nurses union in California is the fact that why they say they are the patients advocate they stand against capping health insurance premiums. In every contract that they go into, they always say they are ok with their members health insurance premiums going up. The problem with that is that when they agree to that, it put unions that represent less skilled labor in a weak position to keep health insurance premiums down for their members. The reason you don’t want to cap health insurance premiums is because you need those increases to insure that the members of the nurses union are able to get 25% increasing from providers like Kaiser in their recent contract. So I guess you are the patients advocate as long as they can afford the increasing health insurance premiums.
God. Sucks, doesn’t it? I’m glad you pointed that out. Look, like I said, I don’t know the answer–but I know that the nurses union is the only voice that matters right now, sadly enough.
And before you go all crazy telling me that the nurses are backing universal healthcare legislation with SB 840 in California, why sell the rest of us out in labor while we wait for at least another decade for the political climate to become right for that type of reform? We know because you need to ensure there is enough money coming into Kaiser to get that 25% raise.
So maybe next time you say someone is speaking out of their a@@ you should step back and actually research what the nurses union in California is actually doing. For those of us in other labor movements, yes I work for a union, watching the nurses have their cake and eat it to is disgusting. If you want to be the moral do gooder in California, and want everyone to treat you that way, then you better step up and be consistent in what you are asking for.
Um, I realize that you aren’t directing this at me. Since, of course, I haven’t made any of these statements. Since I am not a member of the nurses union. And yes, the union and its members should be consistent. And actually, I’m all for universal healthcare. IN THEORY. But we live in the real world, and often enough things that sound so lovely are poo in practice.
Looking forward to seeing your response.
As am I.